SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC app-builder

Build, edit, and deploy Instant-backed apps using npx instant-cli, create-instant-app (Next.js + Codex), GitHub (gh), and Vercel (vercel). Use when asked to create a new app, modify an existing app, fix bugs, add features, or deploy/update an app. Projects live under ~/apps; always work inside the relevant app folder.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: stopachka v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 692 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 31 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (git) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
    • 85Steps. 40 steps, 3 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 692 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 319: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This app-building skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but it gives agents broad deployment and secret-handling instructions without enough scoping or approval controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026