DD agy-ppt
以 AGY 為唯一主控,Kiro 負責所有程式工程,Codex 僅透過 built-in $imagegen 產生或編修整頁簡報圖片的圖片式 PPT/PPTX 工作流程。
以 AGY 為唯一主控,Kiro 負責所有程式工程,Codex 僅透過 built-in $imagegen 產生或編修整頁簡報圖片的圖片式 PPT/PPTX 工作流程。
As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: scripts/phase18_codex_worker.py, scripts/kiro_acp_bridge.py, scripts/presentation_workflow.py
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/image_gen.py:95Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5273 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/phase18_codex_worker.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/kiro_acp_bridge.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/presentation_workflow.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/prepare_slide_prompts.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/project_state.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/validate_project.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/source_grounding.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/ingest_source.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 8 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/phase18_codex_worker.py, scripts/kiro_acp_bridge.py, scripts/presentation_workflow.py
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5273 tokens
- 100Steps. 149 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 85: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -34 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 30 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 149 items
- +4Has examples (24 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (15 of 49)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 48.