BC safehub
Scan OpenClaw skills for malware and security issues before installation. Use when the user wants to verify a skill is safe, audit a ClawHub skill, or check a local or GitHub skill.
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting
AnalyzerGitHubDockerData and analyticsSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:23High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…dau+gx2EnG7S+uAEe+TWJF…WN4/H8MS…Q6Q==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:60High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…uFK+Hk0Q…Dt7+fGUI…5Hx/ru3azECWTyQ==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:88High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha512-j+gKEx…ahh+s1F2HZ+wAce…RkU++ZWQr…uoQ==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:134High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…rvP+yUUf…4tH/iSSo…tEA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:152High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…09f+cXft…VU2/9xiCuXMA==",
detector -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-eval-dynamicrules/obfuscation.yml:32Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted input (detector / deny-list definition)- pattern: eval(atob(...))
detector -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-eval-dynamicrules/obfuscation.yml:33Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted input (detector / deny-list definition)- pattern: eval(Buffer.from(..., "base64").toString())
detector -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-eval-dynamicrules/obfuscation.yml:34Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted input (detector / deny-list definition)- pattern: new Function(atob(...))()
detector
Files scanned: 25. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 8 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 869 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 181: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
SafeHub is a legitimate security scanner, but it needs review because crafted GitHub scan targets can reach a shell command and the sandbox report overstates what it actually observes.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026