SKILLEMALL.ai

AC success-expansion

Use when a customer is already live and producing value, and the rep+CS need to identify account-expansion opportunities (upsell / cross-sell / seat / new-module / new-department) from usage and organizational signals, build a structured expansion case, run the expansion conversation, and hand off to renewal or downstream deal flow. Triggers: '增购', '向上销售', '交叉销售', '加坐席', '升级套餐', '加模块', '账户拓展', 'upsell', 'cross-sell', 'land and expand', 'NRR'. Do NOT use for new-logo acquisition, renewal itself (success-renewal-management), pricing negotiation (clinch-negotiation-pricing), contract signing, or first-value proof (its usage data is INPUT here).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SummerZb v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 1 011 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Use when a customer is already live and producing value, and the rep+CS need to identify account-expansion opportunities (upsell / cross-sell / seat /…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorSales and CRMtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1011 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 649: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed China-focused sales expansion playbook with no code execution, persistence, or hidden data access.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 18 Sept 2026