SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB cli-help-writer

Generate standard, beautifully formatted `--help` documentation for Command Line Interface (CLI) tools based on raw arguments, flags, and descriptions. Triggers when the user asks to write help text, format CLI options, or generate a man page / terminal output text.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Xudong Guo v1.0.2 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 853 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
73/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Tools and files w 18
60
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
    • 100Steps. 7 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 853 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
    • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 266: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill bundle is mostly coherent, but it deserves review because it includes ClawHub maintainer/moderation powers and a review helper that defaults to running nested Codex with full sandbox-bypass access.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026