SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC open-source-license

Open Source License guidance, selection, compliance review, and drafting. Use this skill when users ask about choosing open source licenses, checking license compatibility, reviewing projects for OSS compliance, generating LICENSE/NOTICE files, or understanding specific license terms. Triggers include questions about MIT, Apache, GPL, BSD, LGPL, AGPL, MPL, copyleft, permissive licenses, license compatibility, SPDX identifiers, 木兰宽松许可证, Mulan PSL v2, or any OSS licensing topic.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Xudong Guo v1.0.0 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 1 919 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 100Steps. 71 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1919 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • medium 4 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 481: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 27 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 71 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a text-only open source licensing helper with instructions and reference files that match its stated purpose.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026