SKILLEMALL.ai

BC supah-wallet-xray

Instant wallet intelligence for any EVM address. Know who you're dealing with before you interact. Wallet age, transaction history, token holdings, DeFi activity, risk flags, ENS resolution, and a Trust Score (0-100). Works across 21+ EVM chains. x402 USDC micropayments on Base.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: supah-based v1.3.0 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 115 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:11
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "x402": { "enabled": true, "currency": "USDC", "network": "base", "maxPerCall": "0.05", "payTo": "0xD3…761" }
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:43
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "Who is this wallet? 0xd8…045"
    quoted

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 22 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1115 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 279: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This wallet-analysis skill is purpose-built, but it can trigger paid external lookups from broad prompts without a clear per-scan confirmation step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026