SKILLEMALL.ai

AC intelligence

Use when the user asks "what's hot", "what's moving", "any alpha", "show me squeeze setups", "what's the setup on ETH", "is SOL coiled", "should I deploy NEAR" or any market-scan / single-pair-drilldown question. Surfaces Superior Trade's live multi-bucket scoring across Hyperliquid alts + HIP-3 (stocks/indices/commodities/FX) — Squeeze fuel, Stealth accumulation, Coiled spring, Basis flipping. The engine picks the strongest timeframe (15m/1h/4h/24h) per pair per bucket; you don't pick one. Pairs in to the existing strategy → backtest → deployment workflow at api.superior.trade.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Superior-AI v0.1.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 731 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Use when the user asks "what's hot", "what's moving", "any alpha", "show me squeeze setups", "what's the setup on ETH", "is SOL coiled", "should I deploy…

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "updated"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 85Steps. 10 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 731 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 585: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is coherent for trading analysis, but it can guide users into live trading deployment and wallet credential submission without enough risk and consent guardrails.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 22 Jun 2026