SKILLEMALL.ai

BF cuihua-error-handler

🛡️ AI-powered error handling assistant that transforms fragile code into resilient systems. Automatically generate comprehensive error handling, recovery strategies, and graceful degradation. Because every production system deserves bulletproof error handling.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: supermario11 v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 4 340 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 36/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: docs/README.md, docs/best-practices.md, LICENSE

GeneratorSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
58
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
36/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: docs/README.md, docs/best-practices.md, LICENSE
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: docs/README.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: docs/best-practices.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: LICENSE

Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: docs/README.md, docs/best-practices.md, LICENSE
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: docs/README.md, docs/best-practices.md, LICENSE
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4340 tokens
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -245 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 262: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a legitimate error-handling helper, but its generated examples can add risky logging and response patterns that may expose sensitive application data.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026