BC ironclaw-ai
IronClaw AI — military-style productivity OS. Use for any mission/task, habit, goal, tennis, sleep, discipline-score, briefing, or coaching request, in English or Indonesian. Routes natural language to /mission, /habit, /tennis, /sleep, and /status commands.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
ReferencePersonal productivityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5066 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "keywords" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "languages" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "supportsLanguages" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requiresAuthentication"
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5066 tokens
- 100Steps. 97 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 9 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (47 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 258: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 36 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 97 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a productivity tracker, but it broadly turns ordinary planning language into external API commands and includes scheduled background notifications.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 7 Jun 2026