BF sustoiclab-think-framework
思考框架工具箱 · Su's StoicLab。当用户需要分析问题原因、做战略评估、对比选项做决策、多角度全面思考或优化精力分配时使用。覆盖根因分析(5W2H+鱼骨图)、战略评估(SWOT+波特五力)、决策支持(决策矩阵+成本效益)、多维思考(六顶思考帽)、效率聚焦(80/20法则+逆向思维)等场景。原创作品 by 苏庶 @ 钝感实验室。
思考框架工具箱 · Su's StoicLab。当用户需要分析问题原因、做战略评估、对比选项做决策、多角度全面思考或优化精力分配时使用。覆盖根因分析(5W2H+鱼骨图)、战略评估(SWOT+波特五力)、决策支持(决策矩阵+成本效益)、多维思考(六顶思考帽)、效率聚焦(80/20法则+逆向思维)等场景。原创作品 by…
As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/模块D_多维思考.md, references/模块A_根因分析.md, references/模块B_战略评估.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/模块D_多维思考.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/模块A_根因分析.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/模块B_战略评估.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/模块C_决策支持.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/模块E_效率聚焦.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100
- 0Tools and files. 5 referenced file(s) missing: references/模块D_多维思考.md, references/模块A_根因分析.md, references/模块B_战略评估.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Steps. 109 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1157 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 170: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 109 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.