SKILLEMALL.ai

DD security-monitor-v15-t33

(no description)

Not recommendedlow grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: t33-coder v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 859 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
D
52/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
87
Quality 40%
0
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 13

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 13
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege README.md:30
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo python3 scripts/monitor.py
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege README.md:83
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo python3 scripts/monitor.py
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege README.md:112
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo python3 scripts/monitor.py
    security skill
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention README.md:119
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (documentation of a security skill)
    crontab -e
    security skill
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/common-ports.md:25
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    | 4444 | Metasploit reverse shell默认端口 / Metasploit reverse shell default port |
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/security-checklist.md:48
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - 反弹shell: `bash -i`, `nc -l` / Reverse shell
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/monitor.py:591
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (detector / deny-list definition; string literal in code, not executed)
    r'chmod 777.*shadow',
    detectorcode literal
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/monitor.py:964
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)
    print(Colors.blue("     - 单次扫描: sudo python3 scripts/monitor.py"))
    code literal
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/monitor.py:965
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)
    print(Colors.blue("     - 持续监控: sudo python3 scripts/monitor.py --continuous"))
    code literal
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/monitor.py:966
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)
    print(Colors.blue("     - 自定义间隔: sudo python3 scripts/monitor.py -c -i 60"))
    code literal
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege SKILL.md:113
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo python3 .codebuddy/skills/security-monitor/scripts/monitor.py
    security skill

A further 2 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error frontmatter SKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found
  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 49 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 859 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed local security-audit tool, but its reports should be handled as sensitive system information.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026