SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD ai-doc-reviewer

飞书 AI 文档审查 Skill - 对技术文档进行智能审查，支持文献调研、方案推演、实验设计、对外材料四类。 接收用户提供的文档内容或公开链接，生成审查报告并创建飞书云文档。 必需交付物：1) 在对话中输出报告 2) 创建飞书审查报告文档 3) 创建或更新汇总表 触发词：AI 文档审查、飞书文档审查、审查文档、doc review

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Tang-Auuu v2.9.4 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 2 165 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires_credentials"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "credentials_help"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "binaries"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "runtime_permissions"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "deliverables"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "install"

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (ai-doc-reviewer) differs from the folder (doc-review-auuu)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 73 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2165 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 167: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 51 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
  • +4Has examples (22 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Feishu document-review skill is coherent, but it asks for cloud document read/write authority and persistently writes reports and raw document links with limited confirmation or safety controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026