SKILLEMALL.ai

AC issue-card-writer

Generate structured GitHub issue cards for the WeBuddhist team. Use this when a backend dev needs to document a new or changed endpoint, or when a frontend/app dev needs an integration card. Triggers on "create an issue card", "write a card for this endpoint", "document this API", or when an OpenAPI spec is provided. Works with OpenAPI specs, natural language, or inline endpoint details.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Tech-lo v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 862 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice

GeneratorGitHubSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (issue-card-writer) differs from the folder (github-issue-writer)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 30 steps
    • 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 862 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4Structure: 0 headings, hard to scan
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 390: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a markdown-only GitHub issue-card workflow that can create and link issues only after user review and approval.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026