SKILLEMALL.ai

BD go-dev

Opinionated Go setup with golangci-lint v2, gofumpt, gotestsum, golang-migrate, and just. Use when starting a Go project, configuring lint, format, test, coverage or CI, writing a Justfile, wiring migrations, or leaving a Makefile workflow.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Misha Kolesnik v0.4.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 5 861 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
80
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 4

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 4
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell references/golangci-lint-reference.md:11
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (the skill's own vendor host)
    curl -sSfL https://golangci-lint.run/install.sh | sh -s -- -b $(go env GOPATH)/bin v2.13.2
    vendor-host
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/justfile-reference.md:101
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions
    sudo cp myapp /usr/local/bin/
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell SKILL.md:56
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (the skill's own vendor host)
    curl -sSfL https://golangci-lint.run/install.sh | sh -s -- -b $(go env GOPATH)/bin v2.13.2
    vendor-host
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell SKILL.md:504
    Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (the skill's own vendor host)
    curl -sSfL https://golangci-lint.run/install.sh | sh -s -- -b $(go env GOPATH)/bin v2.13.2
    vendor-host

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5861 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5861 tokens
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 240: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Go development skill is mostly coherent, but it should be reviewed because some setup instructions execute unverified remote code or mutable tool versions on the user's machine.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026