AD GOG Weekly Sales Analytics
Automated weekly workflow that scrapes GOG store discounts, analyzes the full discounted-game dataset with Gemini, generates a markdown insights report, and syncs it to Feishu Drive. Use for recurring game-deal reporting and team distribution.
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:12Reads a .env filecp .env.example .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvSKILL.md:21Reads a .env filecp .env.example .env
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (GOG Weekly Sales Analytics) differs from the folder (gog-sales-analytics)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 323 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 243: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s reporting and cloud-sync behavior is mostly disclosed, but running it also automatically publishes the whole working directory to ClawHub, which is a high-impact action that needs review.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 20 Jun 2026