SKILLEMALL.ai

BD weekly-review

面向任意 AI Agent 自动复盘的 Skill(weekly-review / 复盘 / 提示词优化 / 会话清理)。 核心能力覆盖:AI 用量与时间看板、提示词复盘与改写建议、高效/低效归因、 时间分布与 Token/归因趋势图、开放会话对齐清理、定时自动周报。 当用户任务涉及周度复盘、用量查看、提示词改进时使用,包括但不限于: Token 花了多少、提示词优化改进、一周总结、工作复盘、复盘可视化报告、 清理对话、AI 自动复盘。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: testman2025 v1.2.5 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 271 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

面向任意 AI Agent 自动复盘的 Skill(weekly-review / 复盘 / 提示词优化 / 会话清理)。 核心能力覆盖:AI 用量与时间看板、提示词复盘与改写建议、高效/低效归因、 时间分布与 Token/归因趋势图、开放会话对齐清理、定时自动周报。…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "read_when"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 12 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 271 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 220: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The skill is a coherent weekly AI-usage review and report renderer; its sensitive review inputs are disclosed, but users should keep data collection scoped.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 24 Jul 2026