SKILLEMALL.ai

BC ai-report-free

AI财报分析是一个专业的ai report 2工具,提供完整的自动化处理能力。核心功能包括:财务分析专业门槛高。AI财报分析-F-score摘要+暴雷预警,财务分析场景效率提升3倍。财务分析专业门槛高。内置错误处理机制和参数验证。支持中英文输入输出。提供标准化的返回格式。适用于多种业务场景。可直接集成到现有工作流中。降低手动操作成本。提供详细的使用示例和文档。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.2 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 476 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

AI财报分析是一个专业的ai report…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "edition"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "核心能力"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "适用场景"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "差异化"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 105 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2476 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 20 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 181: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 60 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 105 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This finance-analysis skill is not clearly malicious, but it requests broad command execution and external data/API use without enough user-facing limits or privacy disclosure.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Aug 2026