BF blog-writer
基于作者已发表作品校准语气、用词、结构与长度,产出直白、有观点、 对话式且扎根实战经验的博客文章。覆盖信息收集、起草、审查迭代、 笔记平台发布与示例库维护全流程。可自动提升工作效率。Use。Use when 需要生成营销文案、写作内容、标题优化、内容创作时使用。不适用于纯技术文档撰写。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。 功能涵盖: blog, writer。
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/blog-examples/, references/style-guide.md
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 9, column 14: description: 基于作者已发表作品校准语气、用词、结构与长度,产出直白、有观点、 对话式且扎根实战经验的博客文章。覆盖信息收集、起草、审查迭代、 笔… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 186 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/blog-examples/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/style-guide.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/blog-examples/, references/style-guide.md
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/blog-examples/, references/style-guide.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 70 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1755 tokens
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 186: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 47 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 70 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent blog-writing assistant, but it requires unfinished drafts to be sent to an external notes database and declares broad command execution without clear limits.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 2 Aug 2026