BC chat-agent-tool-free
临时密码保护的实时聊天室，支持SSE流式推送、Web UI与Agent CLI接入。Use when 需要设计创作、UI设计、海报制作、品牌视觉时使用。不适用于3D建模和动画制作。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。支持中文交互，无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用，减少二次加工成本。
临时密码保护的实时聊天室，支持SSE流式推送、Web UI与Agent CLI接入。Use when 需要设计创作、UI设计、海报制作、品牌视觉时使用。不适用于3D建模和动画制作。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。支持中文交互，无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用，减少二次加工成本。
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlSKILL.md:172Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination)# Public URL: https://random-name.trycloudflare.com
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1942 tokens
- low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 150: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 47 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.