BC cloud-architect-free
cloud architect free工具。基础云架构设计技能,覆盖 AWS、Azure、GCP 三大云平台的服务选型、迁移策略框架与基础架构设计原则,适合单云架构设计入门与常见云架构咨询。Use when 需要设计创作、UI设计、海报制作、品牌视觉时使用。不适用于3D建模和动画制作。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。
cloud architect free工具。基础云架构设计技能,覆盖 AWS、Azure、GCP 三大云平台的服务选型、迁移策略框架与基础架构设计原则,适合单云架构设计入门与常见云架构咨询。Use when…
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processSKILL.md:203Starts a background / autostarted processsystemctl enable httpd
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Implicit keys need to be on a single line at line 11, column 1: ## 输入规范 | 参数名 | 类型 | 必填 | 。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景，提供结构化输出与错误处理机制，支持中文交互，即开即用" ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 167 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools"
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 53 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2364 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 167: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 50 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.