SKILLEMALL.ai

BC content-template

内容模板管理(v25.0合并content-catalog),Jinja2引擎变量替换/条件渲染/循环/继承,A/B测试和文案润色+内容品类目录查询。 触发词:内容模板/模板创建/变量替换/A-B测试/文案润色/去AI味/电商文案/Jinja2模板/内容品类/内容菜单 不触发:内容发布/趋势发现/视频生成

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 602 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

内容模板管理(v25.0合并content-catalog),Jinja2引擎变量替换/条件渲染/循环/继承,A/B测试和文案润色+内容品类目录查询。 触发词:内容模板/模板创建/变量替换/A-B测试/文案润色/去AI味/电商文案/Jinja2模板/内容品类/内容菜单 不触发:内容发布/趋势发现/视频生成

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

TemplateSoftware developmentData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 59 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1602 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 153: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 59 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a coherent content-template tool, but it needs Review because it can render stored Jinja2 templates with unsandboxed Python power and send rich business context to external LLM routing without clear user-facing controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 15 Aug 2026