BC decision-architect-free
|-. 适用于需要decision architect相关能力的开发场景,包含结构化的工作流程和可复用的模板,帮助用户快速完成任务并保持代码质量.该技能适用于相关开发场景,包含结构化的工作流程和配置指引.经过深度差异化处置,针对用户反馈和使用痛点进行了改进,提升了实用性和可操作性.该技能适用于相关开发场景,包含结构化的工作流程和配置指引.经过深度差异化处置,针对用户反馈和使用痛点进行了改进,提升了实用性和可操作性.
|-. 适用于需要decision…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: All mapping items must start at the same column at line 9, column 1: description: "|-. 适用于需要decision architect相关能力的开发场景,包含结构化的工作流程和可复用的模板,帮助用户快速完成任务… 面向 AI Agent 的基础结构化决策支持系统，提供决策框架匹配与认知偏差检测两大核心能力. ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 209 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 945 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 209: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a Markdown decision-support guide, but it requests command execution and write access that its own documentation says it does not need.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 27 Jul 2026