BF java-code-reviewer
Java 代码审查报告生成器。用于审查 Java 代码变更，生成结构化审查报告。Use when 需要代码生成、编程辅助、调试测试、开发部署时使用。不适用于模糊的通用需求。适用于独立开发者、团队和自动化流程场景。支持中文交互，无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用，减少二次加工成本。。内置智能分析引擎，自动识别用户需求并匹配优选处理策略，减少手动干预。
Java 代码审查报告生成器。用于审查 Java 代码变更，生成结构化审查报告。Use when…
As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/rules.md, assets/report-template.md
The same skill appears in 2 more places: ClawHub, ClawHub
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Map keys must be unique at line 26, column 1: category: Development homepage: "" ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 178 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/rules.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/report-template.md - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier"
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/rules.md, assets/report-template.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (java-code-reviewer) differs from the folder (java-reviewer)
- 100Steps. 30 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1013 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 178: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 30 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.