SKILLEMALL.ai

BF knowledge-agent-tool-free

基于文件的知识捕获与检索工具,支持URL、视频、文章、社交内容收藏与搜索。Use when 需要SEO优化、关键词分析、排名提升、搜索流量优化时使用。不适用于黑帽SEO手段。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。支持中文交互,无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用,减少二次加工成本。提供结构化输出和错误处理机制。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.3 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 739 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

基于文件的知识捕获与检索工具,支持URL、视频、文章、社交内容收藏与搜索。Use when…

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: urls/2026-02-26-ai-agent-guide.md, extracts/2026-02-26-python-async.md, research/2026-02-26-ai-market.md

IntegrationSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: urls/2026-02-26-ai-agent-guide.md, extracts/2026-02-26-python-async.md, research/2026-02-26-ai-market.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: urls/2026-02-26-ai-agent-guide.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: extracts/2026-02-26-python-async.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: research/2026-02-26-ai-market.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: urls/2026-02-26-ai-agent-guide.md, extracts/2026-02-26-python-async.md, research/2026-02-26-ai-market.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: urls/2026-02-26-ai-agent-guide.md, extracts/2026-02-26-python-async.md, research/2026-02-26-ai-market.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1739 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 162: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 40 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly a local knowledge-management helper, but it asks for command execution while leaving external API behavior and automatic mutating maintenance under-scoped.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 29 Aug 2026