BD notion-api-toolkit-free
(no description)
一个面向个人开发者与知识工作者的轻量化Notion集成Skill,通过托管OAuth与REST API的组合,帮助你快速接入Notion工作空间。本免费版聚焦查询与基础读写,适合个人与小型团队试用。 本Skill封装了Notion…
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
IntegrationNotionSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Map keys must be unique at line 43, column 1: suggested_price: "9.9 CNY/per_use" tools: ["read", "write", "exec"] ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "edition" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_model" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "suggested_price"
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 42 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1829 tokens
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 40 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This Notion skill is mostly coherent, but it asks for powerful CLI-based read/write access while using overly broad triggers and unrelated local network diagnostics.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 23 Jul 2026