BC observability-and-instrumentation
|- 功能涵盖: instrum。Use when 需要提升效率、自动化流程、批量处理、工作流优化时使用。不适用于需要人工创意判断的任务。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。支持中文交互，无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用，减少二次加工成本。提供结构化输出和错误处理机制。支持多场景应用和灵活配置。 功能涵盖: instrumentation。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Not a YAML token: 功能涵盖: instrum。Use when 需要提升效率、自动化流程、批量处理、工作流优化时使用。不适用于需要人工创意判断的任务。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。支持中文交互，无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用，减少二次加工成本。提供结构化输出和错误处理机制。支持多场景应用和灵活配置。 功能涵盖: instrumentation。 at line 10, column 17: description: |- 功能涵盖: instrum。Use when 需要提升效率、自动化流程、批量处理、工作流优化时使用。不适用于需要人工创意判断的… ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "edition" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "suggested_price" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_model"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1431 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 180: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears to be a broad automation template for observability work, but it asks for read and command-execution capability without clear limits or user controls.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 14 Aug 2026