SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC office-automation-pro

常见办公流程自动化处理 - 智能办公助手，支持文档处理、数据整理、邮件管理、日程安排、报表生成等 核心能力: - 效率工具领域的专业化AI辅助工具 - 基于高人气开源Skill深度优化升级 - 移除风险代码,增强安全性和稳定性 适用场景: - 工作流自动化、任务调度、批处理 - 独立开发者与一人公司效率提升 - 自动化工作流与智能决策辅助 差异化:经过深度优化,去除原始风险代码,清理外部依赖引用,增强元数据和触发关键词,完全适配SkillHub平台规范。 触发关键词: 支持文档处理, office, 常见办公流程, 智能办公助手, office-automation-pro, automation, 自动化处理, 数据整理

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 760 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:256
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
    **收款**: USDC (Polygon: 0x3D…120) | 微信支付

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 71 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 760 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 325: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 31 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 71 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This office automation skill is broadly purpose-aligned, but it asks for command execution while promoting bulk email, cloud integrations, scheduling, and sensitive business-data workflows without clear limits or consent gates.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 17 Jul 2026