SKILLEMALL.ai

BF plug-bundle-accounting-and-finance

整合4个互补skill的营销组合包,覆盖Finance等领域。组合内各skill协同工作,提供从数据输入到结果输出的端到端处理能力。针对财务数据处理耗时易错、accounting-and-finance: 存在易出错问题 (风险)等痛点提供解决方案。组合购买可节省20.0%费用,相比单独购买更经济。包含4个经质量审核的skill,整体评分81.5分。

ClawHub Hermes author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 2 770 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

整合4个互补skill的营销组合包,覆盖Finance等领域。组合内各skill协同工作,提供从数据输入到结果输出的端到端处理能力。针对财务数据处理耗时易错、accounting-and-finance: 存在易出错问题…

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: support@example.com

ProcedureFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
58
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: support@example.com
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
  3. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 176 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: support@example.com
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "edition"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "bundle_slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "members"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "overall_score"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "suggested_price"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier"

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: support@example.com
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: support@example.com
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 84 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2770 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 176: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 43 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
  • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This finance bundle is not malicious, but it asks for broad file-writing, command-execution, API, and reminder-trigger authority around sensitive financial workflows without enough scoping or user-control guidance.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026