BC stripe-payment-integrator
支付集成专家——基于Stripe官方优选实践实现全流程支付集成,覆盖支付意图创建、订阅管理、Webhook处理、退款分账全链路。同时提供微信支付/支付宝/银联国内替代方案。适用于电商支付、SaaS订阅、退款处理、平台分账、发票管理、Webhook集成场景。触发关键词:支付集成、Stripe、订阅、Webhook、退款、发票、支付意图、3D 功能涵盖: integrator。
支付集成专家——基于Stripe官方优选实践实现全流程支付集成…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
IntegrationStripeSoftware developmentAI and agentsCommercetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Implicit keys need to be on a single line at line 11, column 1: tags: 支付集成,Stripe,电商支付,集成,stripe,webhook - 支付集成 ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 188 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 65 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3517 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 188: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 36 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 65 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a coherent payment-integration coding skill, with no hidden or destructive behavior found, though users should review generated payment and refund logic carefully.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 20 Aug 2026