SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC tg-bot-builder-free

面向独立开发者与小团队的Telegram机器人构建助手，覆盖Bot创建、交互菜单、消息流转、群组管理等核心场景。核心能力：通过自然语言指令生成Bot配置代码，支持Reply键盘、Inline内联按钮、Webhook接入、自动回复规则与基础群组权限管理。Use

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 628 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

面向独立开发者与小团队的Telegram机器人构建助手，覆盖Bot创建、交互菜单、消息流转、群组管理等核心场景。核心能力：通过自然语言指令生成Bot配置代码，支持Reply键盘、Inline内联按钮、Webhook接入、自动回复规则与基础群组权限管理。Use

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationTelegramSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url SKILL.md:119
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)
      curl -s "https://api.telegram.org/bot<TOKEN>/setWebhook?url=https://yourdomain.com/webhook"
      placeholder

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Map keys must be unique at line 21, column 1: suggested_price: "19.9 CNY/per_use" tools: ["read", "write", "exec"] ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "edition"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "pricing_tier"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "pricing_model"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "suggested_price"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1628 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 129: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 36 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This looks like a Telegram bot-building helper, but its broad activation wording combined with write and command-execution permissions makes it worth reviewing before install.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 23 Jul 2026