SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC token-saver-skill

Smart token cost optimization for OpenClaw. Automatically reduces AI token consumption by 50-80% ... 核心能力: - 智能代理领域的专业化AI辅助工具 - 基于高人气开源Skill深度优化升级 - 移除风险代码,增强安全性和稳定性 适用场景: - AI代理增强、记忆管理、自主决策 - 独立开发者与一人公司效率提升 - 自动化工作流与智能决策辅助 差异化:经过深度优化,去除原始风险代码,清理外部依赖引用,增强元数据和触发关键词,完全适配SkillHub平台规范。 触发关键词: token, cost, optimization, openclaw, smart, saver, skill

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 246 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 41 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2246 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 356: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 30 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is a prompt-only token-saving helper, but it requests broad execution authority and describes automatic caching/compression behavior without clear implementation, limits, or privacy controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 17 Jul 2026