SKILLEMALL.ai

BC update-guardian

更新守护者是面向Agent平台与已安装技能包的自动更新能力包。它不只是设个每日cron跑 update命令,更解决四个高频痛点:更新引入破坏性变更导致线上崩、更新后无法回滚、 依赖版本冲突、更新时机撞上业务高峰。 核心能力: - 预检干跑:先dry-run检查兼容性,发现breaking change先告警不自动应用 - 版本快照:更新前自动快照当前版本与配置,可一键回滚 - 兼容性矩阵:检测新版本与已安装技能/依赖的版本冲突 - 智能调度:按业务低峰期调度更新,避开高峰 - 配置备份:更新前备份配置文件,更新后自动diff校验 - 健康检查:更新后跑健康检查,失败自动回滚 适用场景: - Agent平台与技能包每日自动更新 - 担心更新引入破坏性变更 - 更新后出问题不知怎么回滚 - 多技能依赖同一库的不同版本冲突 - 需要在业务低峰期安全更新 差异化: - 原始版本只设cron跑update,本版补齐"预检+快照+回滚"三段式安全更新 - 移除原仓库特定烙印,通用化适配任意Agent平台与技能包管理器 - 新增兼容性矩阵与依赖冲突检测 - 新增智能调度(业务低峰期) - 新增健康检查失败自动回滚 触发关键词:自动更新、技能更新、版本回滚、破坏性变更、兼容性检查、快照、更新调度

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 886 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

更新守护者是面向Agent平台与已安装技能包的自动更新能力包。它不只是设个每日cron跑 update命令,更解决四个高频痛点:更新引入破坏性变更导致线上崩、更新后无法回滚、 依赖版本冲突、更新时机撞上业务高峰。 核心能力: - 预检干跑:先dry-run检查兼容性,发现breaking…

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 13 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1886 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 552: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 32 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
  • +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears purpose-built rather than malicious, but it can run broad platform and skill update, rollback, backup, and scheduling actions with loose activation and confirmation boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 17 Jul 2026