BF learn-anything
Master any topic with AI-powered learning paths using proven learning science methods including spaced repetition, active recall, and quizzing. Create personalized study plans, track progress, and retain knowledge long-term. Perfect for learning programming, languages, skills, and any subject. Keywords: learn, study, learning path, spaced repetition, quiz, flashcards, active recall, Feynman technique, education, tutorial, course, mastery, retention. Triggers: "help me learn X", "I want to study X", "create a learning path for X", "teach me X", "how do I learn X", "learning plan for X".
As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/quiz-templates.md, scripts/track-progress.py
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 3, column 14: description: Master any topic with AI-powered learning paths using proven learn… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/quiz-templates.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/track-progress.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/quiz-templates.md, scripts/track-progress.py
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 68 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1890 tokens
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -225 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 592: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.