SKILLEMALL.ai

AF prompt-optimizer

Use when the user asks to optimize, improve, or rewrite a prompt, or when a vague request needs to be turned into a precise instruction. Two engines: 3300+ template library + LLM meta-prompting. Do NOT use for general conversation or code review.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Thomaszhou v4.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 2 163 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 33 h ago

Two engines: 3300+ template library + LLM meta-prompting.

As a process F 40/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/categories/index.json, references/categories/{类别名}.json, references/categories/{类别}.json

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
40/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/categories/index.json, references/categories/{类别名}.json, references/categories/{类别}.json
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/categories/index.json
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/categories/{类别名}.json
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/categories/{类别}.json

Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/categories/index.json, references/categories/{类别名}.json, references/categories/{类别}.json
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/categories/index.json, references/categories/{类别名}.json, references/categories/{类别}.json
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (prompt-optimizer) differs from the folder (tz-prompt-optimizer)
  • 100Steps. 74 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2163 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 246: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This prompt-optimization skill appears purpose-aligned, but it needs review because it uses broad activation language and appears to create persistent state and retrieve prompt libraries without clear user control.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 17 Jun 2026