SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC draft-cli

Manage InnoSage Draft pages and hosted Secret Shares using the @innosage/draft-cli. Use this skill for `draft`, `draft page ...`, `draft secret ...`, and `draft auth ...`. Prefer JSON Workspace page operations anchored by workspace status/path metadata. Do not use this skill when "draft" is only a verb or when the task is a generic local-file writing task unrelated to Draft CLI.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jim Liu v1.9.5 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 569 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 14 d ago

Manage InnoSage Draft pages and hosted Secret Shares using the @innosage/draft-cli.

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 74): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 19 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 30 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2569 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (21 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 381: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly matches its Draft CLI purpose, but it tells agents to automatically follow URLs from public page metadata without validation, which can expose unintended internal or sensitive resources.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026