AC visual-note-card
Generate professional Chinese visual note cards (视觉笔记卡片/信息图) as single-page HTML infographics with automatic PNG export. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create a visual note, knowledge card, infographic, one-pager summary, visual summary, 知识卡片, 视觉笔记, 信息图, 一页纸总结, or any poster-style knowledge visualization. Also trigger when the user wants to summarize an article, blog post, book chapter, or concept into a structured visual card format, or when they reference an existing visual note and ask to create one in the same style. This skill produces both a self-contained HTML file and a high-quality PNG image, ready for sharing on social media or printing.
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/html2png.py:42Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (detector / deny-list definition; string literal in code, not executed)browser = p.chromium.launch(args=["--no-sandbox", "--disable-setuid-sandbox"])
detectorcode literal
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 68 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2230 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 665: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 16 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.