SKILLEMALL.ai

AC afa-funding

Discover Angels for Agents funding opportunities, assess an agent-led venture's readiness, prepare and validate an AFA pitch, submit an explicitly authorized application, or report an existing Proof Grant milestone. Use for AI agents or their accountable controllers seeking AFA grants or agent-venture funding through angelsforagents.com.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Tom Rikert v1.1.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 794 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Discover Angels for Agents funding opportunities, assess an agent-led venture's readiness, prepare and validate an AFA pitch, submit an explicitly authorized…

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 794 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 339: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a narrow funding-assistance workflow that discloses its external submissions and requires explicit user authorization before any application or report is sent.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Aug 2026