SKILLEMALL.ai

AC insforge-cli

Use this skill whenever the user needs backend infrastructure management — creating database tables, running SQL, deploying serverless functions, managing storage buckets, deploying frontend apps, adding secrets, setting up cron jobs, or checking logs — especially if the project uses InsForge. Trigger on any of these contexts: creating or altering database tables/schemas, writing RLS policies via SQL, deploying or invoking edge functions, creating storage buckets, deploying frontends to hosting, managing secrets/env vars, setting up scheduled tasks/cron, viewing backend logs, or exporting/importing database backups. If the user asks for these operations generically (e.g., "create a users table", "deploy my app", "set up a cron job") and you're unsure whether they use InsForge, consult this skill and ask. For writing frontend application code with the InsForge SDK (@insforge/sdk), use the insforge skill instead.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Tony Chang v0.1.0 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 3 282 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationInfrastructureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 50 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 65 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3282 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (26 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 924: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +4Structure: 33 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 65 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 7)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This InsForge admin helper is not clearly malicious, but it needs review because it can install tools/skills and gives an agent broad authority over databases, secrets, deployments, and persistent backend resources.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026