BC boss-ai-agent
Boss AI Agent — your AI management middleware. Connects boss to all systems (Telegram/Slack/GitHub/Notion/Email), 16 mentor philosophies, 6 AI C-Suite seats, 9 culture packs, 7 automated scenarios. Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT, and Gemini via MCP.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, consistency
ProcedureNotionSlackTelegramGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 9251 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "emoji" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (boss-ai-agent) differs from the folder (management-brain)
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 9251 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 170 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 12 branches, has a failure section
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -228 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 250: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 60 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 170 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (24 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This is a workplace management automation skill with disclosed useful features, but it needs Review because it can monitor employee communications, store profiles, contact cloud services, schedule recurring scans, send messages, and run shell diagnostics with incomplete scoping and privacy disclosure.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026