CD feishu-log
飞书日志记录 - 用户主动提供日志内容,智能整理、结构化、层次化后写入飞书文档,不使用固定模板。使用场景:(1) 会议记录,(2) 项目日志,(3) 工作复盘,(4) 重要事件记录
飞书日志记录 - 用户主动提供日志内容,智能整理、结构化、层次化后写入飞书文档,不使用固定模板。使用场景:(1) 会议记录,(2) 项目日志,(3) 工作复盘,(4) 重要事件记录
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 12
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 12
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenlog-simple.mjs:11Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)const APP_SECRET = 'aMRJ…srs';
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenlog-work.mjs:53Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)appSecret: "aMRJ…srs",
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenREADME.md:137Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)const APP_SECRET = "aMRJ…srs";
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenconfig-credentials.js:61High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)app_secret: appSecret.trim() || "aMRJ…srs",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlog-interactive.mjs:5High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)const appSecret = process.env.FEISHU_APP_SECRET || "aMRJ…srs";
detector -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-uselog-interactive.mjs:133Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)const docUrl = `https://wcnh….cn/docx/${docToken}`;vendor-host -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlog-simple.mjs:11High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)const APP_SECRET = 'aMRJ…srs';
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlog-work.mjs:53High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)appSecret: "aMRJ…srs",
detector -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-uselog-work.mjs:241Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)const docUrl = `https://wcnh….cn/docx/${docToken}`;vendor-host -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlog.js:23High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)const APP_SECRET = process.env.FEISHU_APP_SECRET || "aMRJ…srs";
detector -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-uselog.js:158Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)const docUrl = `https://wcnh….cn/docx/${docToken}`;vendor-host -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenREADME.md:137High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)const APP_SECRET = "aMRJ…srs";
detector
Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 89 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1972 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 90: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -234 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 44 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 89 items
- +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.