SKILLEMALL.ai

AB local-business-prospecting

Build and qualify local-business prospect lists by category and geography using Crawlora's Google Maps dataset, live Google Maps, Apple Maps, Yelp, and public business websites. Use when the user wants a deduplicated lead shortlist or CSV with business contacts and qualification evidence.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Tony Wang v1.0.1 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 038 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 75/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorData and analyticsSales and CRMInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
75/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration net-credential-use scripts/crawlora.sh:16
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      : "${CRAWLORA_API_KEY:?Set CRAWLORA_API_KEY first — get a free key at https://crawlora.net?utm_source=…&utm_medium=…&utm_campaign=…"
      vendor-hostquoted

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 75/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1038 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 289: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly matches local business prospecting, but its bundled API helper is broader than the skill description and can leak the Crawlora API key if the API base environment variable is redirected.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 8 Sept 2026