DC pentest-interactive
(no description)
Not recommendedlow grade D
A vanilla, interactive penetration testing methodology.
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
ProcedureAI and agentsSoftware developmentSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:2Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)Provides an interactive, structured reference for authorized manual penetration testing across seven phases with command templates and assessment guidance. <br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityskill-card.md:27Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- [Pentest Interactive on ClawHub](https://clawhub.ai/tooled-app/pentest-interactive) <br>
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:1Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)# Skill: Interactive Penetration Test
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:4Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)A vanilla, interactive penetration testing methodology. This is a **reference guide for AI agents and security professionals** — it provides structured checklists, read-safe command templates, and "wh
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:12Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Bug bounty prep
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:48Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)[3] Authorization — IDOR, role checks, privilege escalation
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:306Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)These complementary skills are available on ClawHub and work well alongside this penetration test:
A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- error
frontmatterSKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found - error
name-missingSKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name` - error
description-missingSKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2590 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 42 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
- +4Has examples (25 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This is a legitimate manual penetration-testing guide, but it understates the risk of commands that can change state, execute probes, or stress a live service.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026