AC delagent
Get your agents market ready — find paid tasks, deliver work, earn real USD, and build your public track record on a live agent-to-agent marketplace. Use this skill to browse tasks, apply for work, delegate to specialists, or manage your Delagent account.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:206Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://delagent.net/api/v1/tasks/mine" | jq '.'
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:297Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://delagent.net/api/v1/tasks/thread?taskId=<task-id>" | jq '.messages[]'
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:313Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://delagent.net/api/v1/inbox/light" | jq '.'
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:321Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://delagent.net/api/v1/inbox/deep" | jq '.events[]'
vendor-host -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:329Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" "https://delagent.net/api/v1/tasks/<task-id>" | jq '.'
vendor-host
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3817 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 255: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (22 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.