BD organisation-documents
Skill central de l'assistant comptable. Réceptionne, classe et nomme automatiquement les documents comptables (factures, relevés bancaires) par client / année / mois / nature, et déduit clients.json depuis les relevés bancaires. À INVOQUER SYSTÉMATIQUEMENT et SANS DEMANDER L'AUTORISATION dès que (a) un e-mail arrive avec une PJ PDF/image, (b) un e-mail contient un mot-clé comptable (facture, invoice, reçu, paiement, TVA, total, acompte, avoir, relevé), (c) le comptable demande de traiter / classer / organiser un document, (d) un fichier est déposé dans l'inbox, (e) le comptable répond à une question d'identification de client. L'extraction et le classement sont faits par scripts/main.py + scripts/extract.py — aucun champ n'est jamais deviné à l'œil.
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 47 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2794 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -45 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 759: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.