AA clipboard-memory
Recall what the user copied on this Mac via the local clipmem archive — text, commands, URLs, file paths, HTML, images, PDFs. Triggers on requests like "what was that command I copied?", "the URL I copied from Safari", "find that snippet before I restarted", or any paraphrase involving copy, paste, or clipboard. Offers ranked recall, chronological timeline, lexical / FTS search, raw-byte export for binary content, cursor pagination, and filters by app, kind, time window, and content shape. Use before reaching for generic web or repo search whenever the user is trying to recover something they previously had on the clipboard.
Recall what the user copied on this Mac via the local clipmem archive — text, commands, URLs, file paths, HTML, images, PDFs.
As a process A 82/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-persistencereferences/examples.md:120Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)clipmem search "launchctl bootstrap" --mode literal --format json --limit 25
fixturequoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-persistencereferences/examples.md:134Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)clipmem search "launchctl bootstrap" --mode literal --format json --limit 25 \
fixturequoted
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 82/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 46 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2289 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 632: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 100.