AC orchestration-reviewer-skill
对现有工作流计划（Plan IR）进行结构化评审，输出评审结论、问题清单和修订建议。 Use when user asks to 评审工作流计划、审查DAG、审核编排方案、review plan IR、 检查计划合理性、对比多个编排版本、自动评审工作流. 不适用于从零生成新计划/单步操作/纯文本任务。
对现有工作流计划（Plan IR）进行结构化评审，输出评审结论、问题清单和修订建议。 Use when user asks to 评审工作流计划、审查DAG、审核编排方案、review plan IR、 检查计划合理性、对比多个编排版本、自动评审工作流.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 863 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 151: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
- +3All 6 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.