SKILLEMALL.ai

AC openclaw-openai-multi-account

Manage multiple OpenAI OAuth login accounts inside OpenClaw, including OpenAI Codex OAuth account snapshots, switching, real active-account detection, 5-hour and weekly quota inspection via Codex CLI cache, ACTIVE metadata repair, auto-enrollment of newly logged-in accounts, same-model auto-rotation near exhaustion, and fallback to a backup model such as Bailian when all OpenAI accounts are unavailable. Use when the user asks about multiple OpenAI OAuth accounts in OpenClaw, OpenAI/Codex account switching, the current real active account, local saved accounts, 5h or weekly remaining quota, OAuth re-login, automatic account rotation, or fallback behavior in OpenClaw.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: tutouguai1933 v1.0.2 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 2 168 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 64 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2168 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 674: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 64 items
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill largely does the account-management job it describes, but its quota check can send OAuth tokens to a configurable web address that is not clearly disclosed or restricted.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026