SKILLEMALL.ai

BF mfz-catalogue-report

将单份 DRG 或 DIP 目录的 XLSX、PDF、扫描/OCR PDF 或 DOCX 原始材料整理为可检索交互报告。用户提到目录整理、DRG 权重目录分析、DIP 病种目录分析、OCR 目录校验、目录治理 Excel 或生成报告链接时使用;通过免费的 MedGroup Catalogue Report MCP 完成任务创建、上传、校验、复核和报告生成。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: u201013903 v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 344 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

将单份 DRG 或 DIP 目录的 XLSX、PDF、扫描/OCR PDF 或 DOCX 原始材料整理为可检索交互报告。用户提到目录整理、DRG 权重目录分析、DIP 病种目录分析、OCR 目录校验、目录治理 Excel 或生成报告链接时使用;通过免费的 MedGroup Catalogue Report MCP…

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/exchange-contract.md, references/review-protocol.md

ProcedureWordExcelData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
59
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/exchange-contract.md, references/review-protocol.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/exchange-contract.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/review-protocol.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/exchange-contract.md, references/review-protocol.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/exchange-contract.md, references/review-protocol.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 344 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 179: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 7 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed DRG/DIP catalogue-report workflow that uploads user-provided catalogue files to a named MedGroup MCP service and does not show hidden or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Jul 2026