AC runninghub-comfyui
Execute RunningHub ComfyUI workflows via API. Use when you need to run ComfyUI workflows on RunningHub cloud platform, submit tasks, query status, and retrieve results.
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (runninghub-comfyui) differs from the folder (comfyui-runninghub)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 42 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1771 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 168: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 30 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
- +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The main RunningHub workflow helper fits its purpose, but the package also includes under-disclosed local Chrome browser automation and plaintext API-key storage that users should review carefully.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026